There was anger concerning my input about Paul. I said that he spoke as one repeating community doctrine rather than trying to establish it, in all cases of marvelous speech I want to add. Paul was a teacher of doctrine & scorner, not an instigator of serious rules.
His accounts of desolation then being second hand or at least coming across that way make them unreliable to the word. In order to speak as the originator of scripture one needs a matter explaining several times or verbatim recollection. His comments like most of his words are great because little else is written about the day to day business of the early church & not because he is called one of the Prophets.
We advise Paul is not used as a cross referrence to support serious prophetic destruction, being a repeater not a source.
